ArkBird
12-13 01:55 PM
Checked with my lawyer who also happened to be ex-IO officer. According to her it could be because of NC clearance...
wallpaper mw logo wallpaper.
Simon Henriksen
07-16 06:46 AM
I can offer your personal or small company a nice looking website for about $250.
I can do simple flash, and HTML. I have experience with different kind of java scripts, and movabletype. I can set up a forum for you if you want that too.
Intersted? Just reply, and tell me what you need and what imagine you have in your head.
/
Simon Henriksen
I can do simple flash, and HTML. I have experience with different kind of java scripts, and movabletype. I can set up a forum for you if you want that too.
Intersted? Just reply, and tell me what you need and what imagine you have in your head.
/
Simon Henriksen
obviously
03-08 09:04 PM
Great job Aman!
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/mar2007/db20070308_624948_page_2.htm
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/mar2007/db20070308_624948_page_2.htm
2011 Bmw Cars mw logo wallpaper.
GCard_Dream
04-30 02:26 PM
For those of you who either are residents (Citizens or PRs) or Canada or have been thinking about becoming residents of Canada but working in US, please share your experience in terms of:
1. How you maintain your residency (or non-residency) in both countries.
2. What are the tax implications if you maintain residency in both countries,
specially if you own property in Canada.
I have heard stories about tax implications in Canada if you own property there even if you permanently live an work in the US. Is that true? Would you be considered a resident in Canada for tax purposes just because you own property (such as vacation homes) but live permanently in US.
I currently own a property in Canada but have been living and working in US for past 8 years and really worried about any tax implications in Canada because of the property. Any help would be very much appreciated.
1. How you maintain your residency (or non-residency) in both countries.
2. What are the tax implications if you maintain residency in both countries,
specially if you own property in Canada.
I have heard stories about tax implications in Canada if you own property there even if you permanently live an work in the US. Is that true? Would you be considered a resident in Canada for tax purposes just because you own property (such as vacation homes) but live permanently in US.
I currently own a property in Canada but have been living and working in US for past 8 years and really worried about any tax implications in Canada because of the property. Any help would be very much appreciated.
more...
yagw
11-11 12:05 PM
My I-485 and I-140 was filed last week. I was wondering how many days it takes to get receit and .
when does the six month count down for AC21 begin???? Is it after receit date or fedex date..thnx
Please let me know
You need to wait till your I-140 is approved. Otherwise, you will face problem in AC21 stage.
That said, the 180 days count from "receipt" date in your I-797 (receipt for I-485). And its better to have few days more, if not few weeks/months (just to be safe).
when does the six month count down for AC21 begin???? Is it after receit date or fedex date..thnx
Please let me know
You need to wait till your I-140 is approved. Otherwise, you will face problem in AC21 stage.
That said, the 180 days count from "receipt" date in your I-797 (receipt for I-485). And its better to have few days more, if not few weeks/months (just to be safe).
vips12
06-11 02:49 PM
Hi
I am currently working on my H1 for comapany A. They have filed my Labor on Dec-06 in EB-3. I have an approved I-140 and I-485 is currently pending.
I have got an offer from company B. They want me to switch on EAD and they said they will also file my H1 and i can then move back on H1.
My question is if i switch the company on EAD, can i switch back to H1B in new (Company C) or same company (Company B) and if so can i then swtich to EB-2 by filing new Labor and 140 using the same priority date.
I am currently working on my H1 for comapany A. They have filed my Labor on Dec-06 in EB-3. I have an approved I-140 and I-485 is currently pending.
I have got an offer from company B. They want me to switch on EAD and they said they will also file my H1 and i can then move back on H1.
My question is if i switch the company on EAD, can i switch back to H1B in new (Company C) or same company (Company B) and if so can i then swtich to EB-2 by filing new Labor and 140 using the same priority date.
more...
vallabhu
07-18 09:07 AM
Did Amit(WaldenPond) get his GC , I have not seen any posts from him in recent past
I think we should remember and thank him for starting this effort.
Sorry for creating new thread for asking this question I tried asking in other thread which totally got lost and never answered.
I think we should remember and thank him for starting this effort.
Sorry for creating new thread for asking this question I tried asking in other thread which totally got lost and never answered.
2010 wallpapers hd for mac.
blao
07-15 07:06 PM
bump
more...
aebuddy
10-12 09:04 AM
I Dont Get The File Type, I Mean It wouldn't let me put it in flash but im dumb so...what can i do w/ it, by the way, i just got it yesterday...
hair girlfriend hd wallpapers of mw
nishaatul26
10-19 02:15 PM
Hi,
If a person is on dependant visa (H4) and applies for green card with their spouse's green card application, can they apply for H1 as well?
Thanks,
Nisha
If a person is on dependant visa (H4) and applies for green card with their spouse's green card application, can they apply for H1 as well?
Thanks,
Nisha
more...
The_Smiths
01-15 11:17 AM
Hello,
I obtained an EAD using my OPT just to be able to work in the U.S. while my fiancee completes her degree (I graduated in December 06 and she will do so in May 07). Since we will get married after she graduates, and will file for adjustment of status, we thought there would be no problem in my ability to work without any interruption.
However, it seems that filing for adjustment of status invalidates your OPT, therefore you wouldn't be able to continue working until you get your new EAD.
Does that mean I would have to stop working for 90 days or so after I get married? (Remember I'm on an F-1 as I think you can keep working if on an H-1B)
If so, is there any way to minimize this problem?
Thanks.
I obtained an EAD using my OPT just to be able to work in the U.S. while my fiancee completes her degree (I graduated in December 06 and she will do so in May 07). Since we will get married after she graduates, and will file for adjustment of status, we thought there would be no problem in my ability to work without any interruption.
However, it seems that filing for adjustment of status invalidates your OPT, therefore you wouldn't be able to continue working until you get your new EAD.
Does that mean I would have to stop working for 90 days or so after I get married? (Remember I'm on an F-1 as I think you can keep working if on an H-1B)
If so, is there any way to minimize this problem?
Thanks.
hot Bmw X6 Wallpaper Hd
Sunx_2004
02-06 12:56 PM
Hi,
I recently got 3 year extension on H1B. I am currently in 8th year of H1B extension. All previous stamping were done in India, I have following question regarding the Visa stamping in Toronto-
Can I get my stamping done in US consulate in Toronto.
Where (Link) to take an appointment for stamping.
List of the documents required.
Anyone who has done it before, Please help
Regards
I recently got 3 year extension on H1B. I am currently in 8th year of H1B extension. All previous stamping were done in India, I have following question regarding the Visa stamping in Toronto-
Can I get my stamping done in US consulate in Toronto.
Where (Link) to take an appointment for stamping.
List of the documents required.
Anyone who has done it before, Please help
Regards
more...
house Amazing Bmw Wallpapers : Cars
immigrationvoice1
02-13 12:32 PM
Which Form should I look for getting this information?
I was using ETA Form 9089 page 11 0 Job duties. Is that the correct place to looks for ?
My company
I-750 Part B
I was using ETA Form 9089 page 11 0 Job duties. Is that the correct place to looks for ?
My company
I-750 Part B
tattoo hd wallpapers of mw cars.
tabletpc
04-06 08:32 PM
This link says in toronto the wait time for Non immigrant visa(h1) is 2 days...how true is this. Has anyone booked within a gap of 2 days...??
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait_result.php?post=Toronto&x=76&y=11
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait_result.php?post=Toronto&x=76&y=11
more...
pictures wallpaper hd bmw. wallpapers
navin80
06-03 03:03 PM
Hi,
The company I am working for is filing for GC.
They have posted an ad,and all the mandatory work is done.
HR up here have received some resumes for this ad.
After reviewing these resumes, attroney says they may have to place a new ad, as they have recieved a resume which qualifies the position from a local person.
I spoke to my manager and he says the same thing.He told me he did not even interview the local guy who applied.
Is this the only way out of this position. Please advise.
Thanks,
The company I am working for is filing for GC.
They have posted an ad,and all the mandatory work is done.
HR up here have received some resumes for this ad.
After reviewing these resumes, attroney says they may have to place a new ad, as they have recieved a resume which qualifies the position from a local person.
I spoke to my manager and he says the same thing.He told me he did not even interview the local guy who applied.
Is this the only way out of this position. Please advise.
Thanks,
dresses File Name :: BMW Wallpaper
sambhajisgayake
12-14 10:12 AM
Hi All,
Sorry i gave a wrong title. i meant duplicate passport application.
Sorry i gave a wrong title. i meant duplicate passport application.
more...
makeup Bmw+cars+wallpaper+hd
luckydog
10-09 08:14 PM
Are you one of the �Faces of America (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.d753808ed0b23b5a64bc77ce843f6d1a/?vgnextoid=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1 RCRD)�?
USCIS wants to hear your story!
Each of us has an immigration story to tell. Many Americans can relate a unique journey to citizenship made by ourselves or by our families before us. It is important for every American to recognize those who have made great sacrifices to become American citizens and how their unique contributions have greatly enriched our nation.
The Faces of America section of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services website allows you the opportunity to share your immigration story with the nation. Please fill out the information below and tell us your story.
Please click here to participate: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.d753808ed0b23b5a64bc77ce843f6d1a/?vgnextoid=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1 RCRD
USCIS wants to hear your story!
Each of us has an immigration story to tell. Many Americans can relate a unique journey to citizenship made by ourselves or by our families before us. It is important for every American to recognize those who have made great sacrifices to become American citizens and how their unique contributions have greatly enriched our nation.
The Faces of America section of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services website allows you the opportunity to share your immigration story with the nation. Please fill out the information below and tell us your story.
Please click here to participate: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.d753808ed0b23b5a64bc77ce843f6d1a/?vgnextoid=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1 RCRD
girlfriend hd wallpaper bmw
ab53579
06-18 07:50 PM
Guys,
I am filing 1-140 and 1-485 together by myself based upn EB-2 ( national interest waiver ) category.
Would any one of you please tell me what I should check Part 2 where it ask " I am applying fr adjustment f permanent status based upon"-- If I choose 2(a), then it ask for copy of approval notice.
Any body has any comments.
Thanks,
Jan
I am filing 1-140 and 1-485 together by myself based upn EB-2 ( national interest waiver ) category.
Would any one of you please tell me what I should check Part 2 where it ask " I am applying fr adjustment f permanent status based upon"-- If I choose 2(a), then it ask for copy of approval notice.
Any body has any comments.
Thanks,
Jan
hairstyles mw wallpaper. BMW New Old Z4
Macaca
10-28 09:52 AM
It's time we seriously ponder fixing the Constitution (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/28/INCHSUV9I.DTL&hw=immigration&sn=008&sc=247) By Larry J. Sabato | San Francisco Chronicle, October 28, 2007
Professor Larry J. Sabato is the author of "A More Perfect Constitution: 23 Proposals to Revitalize Our Constitution and Make America a Fairer Country" (Walker & Company, 2007). He is the founder and director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. Contact us at insight@sfchronicle.com.
What is the undisturbed and unaddressed source of many of the nation's current difficulties? It's the Constitution of the United States.
The Constitution has become a secularly sacred document, as though God handed it to Moses in a third tablet on the Mount. The 2008 presidential candidates have been offering us prescriptions for everything from Iraq to health care over the past several months. But here is the problem: Their fixes are situational and incremental. In the meantime, underlying structural problems with America's governmental and political system are preventing us from solving our most intractable challenges.
If progress as a society is to be made, it is time for elemental change. The last place we look to understand why the U.S. system isn't working well anymore - the Constitution - should be the first place. A careful look at constitutional reform should begin now and culminate in a new Constitutional Convention.
Does this sound radical? If so, then the framers were radicals, too. They would be both disappointed and amazed that after 220 years, the inheritors of their Constitution had not tried to adapt to new developments they could never have anticipated in Philadelphia in 1787. Urging his future countrymen to take advantage of their own experiences with government, George Washington declared, "I do not think we are more inspired, have more wisdom, or possess more virtue, than those who will come after us."
Thomas Jefferson insisted that "No society can make a perpetual Constitution. ... The earth belongs always to the living generation. ... Every Constitution ... naturally expires at the end of 19 years," the length of a generation in Jefferson's time.
The overall design of the Constitution remains brilliant and sound with respect to the Bill of Rights and the separation of powers. But there are numerous archaic provisions that inhibit constructive change and adaptation to a 21st century world unimaginable to the framers.
Let's explore a few: More than 14 million U.S. citizens are automatically and irrevocably barred from holding the office of president simply because they were not born in the United States - either they are immigrants or their U.S. mothers gave birth to them while outside U.S. territory. This exclusion creates a noxious form of second-class citizenship. The requirement that the president must be a "natural born citizen" should be replaced with a condition that a candidate must be a U.S. citizen for at least 20 years before election to the presidency.
Both the Vietnam and Iraq conflicts have illustrated a modern imbalance in the constitutional power to wage war. Once Congress consented to these wars, presidents were able to continue them for many years long after popular support had drastically declined. Limit the president's war-making authority by creating a provision that requires Congress to vote affirmatively every six months to continue U.S. military involvement. Debate in both houses would be limited so that the vote could not be delayed. If either house of Congress voted to end a war, the president would have one year to withdraw all combat troops.
If the 26 least populated states voted as a bloc, they would control the U.S. Senate with a total of just under 17 percent of the country's population. This small-state stranglehold is not merely a bump in the road; it is a massive roadblock to fairness that can, and often does, stop all progressive traffic. We should give each of the 10 most populated states two additional Senate seats and give each of the next 15 most populated states one additional seat. Sparsely populated states will still be disproportionately represented, but the ridiculous tilt to them in today's system can be a thing of the past.
If someone purposefully tried to conjure up the most random and illogical method of nominating presidential candidates, the resulting system would probably look much as ours does today. The incoherent lineup of primaries and caucuses forces candidates to campaign at least a year before the first nomination contest so they can become known nationwide and raise the money needed to compete. Congress should be constitutionally required to designate four regions of contiguous states; the regions would hold their nominating events in successive months, beginning in April and ending in July. A U.S. Election Lottery, to be held on Jan. 1 of the presidential election year, would determine the order of regional events. The new system would add an element of drama to the beginning of a presidential year while also shortening the campaign: No one would know in which region the contest would begin until New Year's Day.
Excessive authority has accrued to the federal courts, especially the Supreme Court - so much so that had the framers realized the courts' eventual powers, they would have limited judicial authority. The insularity of lifetime tenure, combined with the appointments of relatively young attorneys who give long service on the bench, produces senior judges representing the views of past generations better than views of the current day. A nonrenewable term limit of 15 years should apply to all federal judges, from the district courts all the way up to the Supreme Court.
This all is just a mere scratch on the surface in identifying long-overdue constitutional reforms. There are dozens of other worthy proposals than can and ought to be discussed, if we but have the will to imagine a better Constitution. No rational person will rush to change the Constitution, and it will take many years of thorough-going work. But let's at least start the discussion, and begin thinking about the generation-long process that could lead to a new constitutional convention sometime this century.
Professor Larry J. Sabato is the author of "A More Perfect Constitution: 23 Proposals to Revitalize Our Constitution and Make America a Fairer Country" (Walker & Company, 2007). He is the founder and director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. Contact us at insight@sfchronicle.com.
What is the undisturbed and unaddressed source of many of the nation's current difficulties? It's the Constitution of the United States.
The Constitution has become a secularly sacred document, as though God handed it to Moses in a third tablet on the Mount. The 2008 presidential candidates have been offering us prescriptions for everything from Iraq to health care over the past several months. But here is the problem: Their fixes are situational and incremental. In the meantime, underlying structural problems with America's governmental and political system are preventing us from solving our most intractable challenges.
If progress as a society is to be made, it is time for elemental change. The last place we look to understand why the U.S. system isn't working well anymore - the Constitution - should be the first place. A careful look at constitutional reform should begin now and culminate in a new Constitutional Convention.
Does this sound radical? If so, then the framers were radicals, too. They would be both disappointed and amazed that after 220 years, the inheritors of their Constitution had not tried to adapt to new developments they could never have anticipated in Philadelphia in 1787. Urging his future countrymen to take advantage of their own experiences with government, George Washington declared, "I do not think we are more inspired, have more wisdom, or possess more virtue, than those who will come after us."
Thomas Jefferson insisted that "No society can make a perpetual Constitution. ... The earth belongs always to the living generation. ... Every Constitution ... naturally expires at the end of 19 years," the length of a generation in Jefferson's time.
The overall design of the Constitution remains brilliant and sound with respect to the Bill of Rights and the separation of powers. But there are numerous archaic provisions that inhibit constructive change and adaptation to a 21st century world unimaginable to the framers.
Let's explore a few: More than 14 million U.S. citizens are automatically and irrevocably barred from holding the office of president simply because they were not born in the United States - either they are immigrants or their U.S. mothers gave birth to them while outside U.S. territory. This exclusion creates a noxious form of second-class citizenship. The requirement that the president must be a "natural born citizen" should be replaced with a condition that a candidate must be a U.S. citizen for at least 20 years before election to the presidency.
Both the Vietnam and Iraq conflicts have illustrated a modern imbalance in the constitutional power to wage war. Once Congress consented to these wars, presidents were able to continue them for many years long after popular support had drastically declined. Limit the president's war-making authority by creating a provision that requires Congress to vote affirmatively every six months to continue U.S. military involvement. Debate in both houses would be limited so that the vote could not be delayed. If either house of Congress voted to end a war, the president would have one year to withdraw all combat troops.
If the 26 least populated states voted as a bloc, they would control the U.S. Senate with a total of just under 17 percent of the country's population. This small-state stranglehold is not merely a bump in the road; it is a massive roadblock to fairness that can, and often does, stop all progressive traffic. We should give each of the 10 most populated states two additional Senate seats and give each of the next 15 most populated states one additional seat. Sparsely populated states will still be disproportionately represented, but the ridiculous tilt to them in today's system can be a thing of the past.
If someone purposefully tried to conjure up the most random and illogical method of nominating presidential candidates, the resulting system would probably look much as ours does today. The incoherent lineup of primaries and caucuses forces candidates to campaign at least a year before the first nomination contest so they can become known nationwide and raise the money needed to compete. Congress should be constitutionally required to designate four regions of contiguous states; the regions would hold their nominating events in successive months, beginning in April and ending in July. A U.S. Election Lottery, to be held on Jan. 1 of the presidential election year, would determine the order of regional events. The new system would add an element of drama to the beginning of a presidential year while also shortening the campaign: No one would know in which region the contest would begin until New Year's Day.
Excessive authority has accrued to the federal courts, especially the Supreme Court - so much so that had the framers realized the courts' eventual powers, they would have limited judicial authority. The insularity of lifetime tenure, combined with the appointments of relatively young attorneys who give long service on the bench, produces senior judges representing the views of past generations better than views of the current day. A nonrenewable term limit of 15 years should apply to all federal judges, from the district courts all the way up to the Supreme Court.
This all is just a mere scratch on the surface in identifying long-overdue constitutional reforms. There are dozens of other worthy proposals than can and ought to be discussed, if we but have the will to imagine a better Constitution. No rational person will rush to change the Constitution, and it will take many years of thorough-going work. But let's at least start the discussion, and begin thinking about the generation-long process that could lead to a new constitutional convention sometime this century.
pappu
01-08 12:48 PM
//\\
Blog Feeds
11-05 08:40 AM
One of the most reliable pundits when it comes to the math side of politics is the New York Times blogger Nate Silver. He actually comes from a sports background and was known as a master of sports statistics. I've been reading his five thirty-eight blog for the last couple of years and he's usually right on the mark. Nate has done some number crunching to verify claims that Latinos were undercounted in the polls and gave Democrats the margins needed to win in states where they have the largest populations. His finding? Indeed, the NCLR polling I wrote about...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/11/poll-guru-explains-why-latinos-are-consistently-undercounted.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/11/poll-guru-explains-why-latinos-are-consistently-undercounted.html)
No comments:
Post a Comment