Wednesday, June 8, 2011

2011 calendar february and march

2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and
  • 2011 calendar february and


  • qualified_trash
    06-01 10:00 AM
    she is not stupid!! she is right. Your GC and H1 is being sponsored by the employer not by you. All documents etc are indeed the property of the employer. It is the employer's responsibility to keep you updated of any changes in your status.




    2011 calendar february and march. March 2011 Calendar2011 calendar february and march. March 2011 Calendar
  • March 2011 Calendar


  • guy03062
    03-08 09:47 AM
    Please keep posting!




    2011 calendar february and march. February middot; March2011 calendar february and march. February middot; March
  • February middot; March


  • kaizersoze
    07-18 05:16 PM
    Contributed $100. Will sign up for recurring.
    Also referred many of my friends to this site who are also contributed.

    Paypal Transaction ID: 8M951494VW646135K

    We all love IV.

    u rock :)




    2011 calendar february and march. February 20112011 calendar february and march. February 2011
  • February 2011


  • vselvam
    12-17 06:26 PM
    Instead of doing all of this, First, if we able to make every one just take one day off from work on the same day through out the USA and let our employers and the press knows that we are doing this to show about our issues. We do not need to go on rally. At least if we take off on the same day through out USA to make sure people understand about our issues and our sufferings. I am not sure how it will help. At least if we make it to be notified by the government, .press, our employers. and the public about our issues.

    I am not sure it is possible and is it worth? any thoughts...



    more...

    2011 calendar february and march. Calendar Feb-March 2011 - 20112011 calendar february and march. Calendar Feb-March 2011 - 2011
  • Calendar Feb-March 2011 - 2011


  • transpass
    02-23 01:05 PM
    people,

    i just returned from an infopass meeting... the guy i talked to said that they recently have a directive from the DHS/USCIS that they want to separate the legal stuff from the illegal stuff and hence they are planning to adjudicate a record number of EB apps in the next quarter or two... does anyone else concur? is this true or were my ears just ringing in that meeting?

    --shark

    But they can approve only based on available visa numbers...:confused:




    2011 calendar february and march. February 2011 Calendar Sample2011 calendar february and march. February 2011 Calendar Sample
  • February 2011 Calendar Sample


  • vkannan
    03-03 06:41 PM
    That is not true, my lawyer who is very influential and he has some good contacts he told me that this year spill-over would be different form last year. I was stupid so didn�t believe him about July 2007, and paying it for now for not having EAD.

    I know this is hard to believe especially if something comes from lawyer.






    Thank's
    MDix


    Buddy, you are scaring EB2 folks a bit there with your comment (including self...) anyways I truly feel ppl. who applied before me should get their GC....it doesn't matter which category they are in.....anyways buddy your profile says you have a PD in 2008, why do u say you missed 2007 fiasco???:confused:



    more...

    2011 calendar february and march. march 2011 calendar general2011 calendar february and march. march 2011 calendar general
  • march 2011 calendar general


  • snathan
    08-12 12:17 PM
    True. But why then does an employee want to join such company ? It is not that you are not aware of all these before you step to this country through Infy or TCS ?

    I never worked for them. But I have seen so many people suffering and they are ready to suffer to be in the US. I dont want to deviate from the thread..so lets stop this discussion about INFY.




    2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february.2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february.
  • 2011 calendar february.


  • punjabi
    08-13 04:52 PM
    Hi buddyinus,

    We all are going through hard time, but we do not need to display our hard feelings for someone through the forum! If you are upset at someone or if you have complains, email the Admin or a Super Moderator.

    Do not write rude. Be a little professional at your behavior and communicate professionally.



    Now, the fool is trying to change the subject by asking ppl to join the rally. Why in the world wud ppl trust him? The thread is barely 10 pages and after realizing that therez no point in discussing about what this thread is all about, he has shifted subject loyalites. How lame and insane is this guy? Pappu, LogicLife where r u guyz? Why dont u ban him?



    more...

    2011 calendar february and march. Events for March 2011:2011 calendar february and march. Events for March 2011:
  • Events for March 2011:


  • Robert Kumar
    03-14 05:51 PM
    In the last 1 months, how mcuh time is it taking for just the labor to be cleared. Not the pre-labor work. Just labor.
    Thank you,.




    2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and
  • 2011 calendar february and


  • Canadian_Dream
    06-02 07:27 PM
    Effective date is next fiscal year or the one following it. If you read both the sections it cleary says that.
    (Read the word approved and an "or" preceding it).

    or approved at the time of the effective date of this section, shall be treated as if such provision remained effective and an approved petition may serve as the basis for issuance of an immigrant visa.


    In my opinion this clearly means that if you have an approved I-140 before the effective date you should be ok. All pending I-140 on the effective date which is 15 months away are most likely have to refile. That leads to two scenarios:
    1. Approved I-140 with a pending I-485, these petitions will be elegible for immigrant visa whenever one is avialable, this is very clearly mentioned.
    2. Approved I-140 without I-485. No clear indication of how these cases will be treaed. They MIGHT have to refile as well.


    ============
    (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
    32
    33 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), the amendments
    34 made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the
    35 fiscal year subsequent to the fiscal year of enactment, unless
    36 such date is less than 270 days after the date of enactment, in
    37 which case the amendments shall take effect on the first day of
    38 the following fiscal year.
    39
    40 (2) PENDING AND APPROVED PETITIONS AND APPLICATIONS.—Petitions
    41 for an employment-based visa filed for classification under
    42 section 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Immigration and Nationality
    43 Act (as such provisions existed prior to the enactment of this
    44 section) that were filed prior to the date of the introduction of
    265
    1 the [Insert title of Act] and were pending or approved at the
    2 time of the effective date of this section, shall be treated as if
    3 such provision remained effective and an approved petition may
    4 serve as the basis for issuance of an immigrant visa. Aliens with
    5 applications for a labor certification pursuant to section
    6 212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall
    7 preserve the immigrant visa priority date accorded by the date
    8 of filing of such labor certification application.
    9

    The original word is "enactment date", which would be the date the bill is signed into law. The effective date will be oct, 2008.

    So people who didn't get their 140 through before the president signs the bill would be screwed?



    more...

    2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and
  • 2011 calendar february and


  • parvatneni
    09-10 11:50 PM
    Hello november

    Are u sure that "http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html" is not any error ?

    If yes! How come china status is not indicated explicitily as is indicated in travel.state.gov?

    Does any one have previous month cut off date from this site ?

    I am fairly new to this forum -Excuse my ignorence incase if this does not make any sense.




    2011 calendar february and march. Cheryl-Cole-Calendar-2011-2011 calendar february and march. Cheryl-Cole-Calendar-2011-
  • Cheryl-Cole-Calendar-2011-


  • GCwaitforever
    04-30 10:56 AM
    Those numbers can be misleading. USCIS does not count petitions pending under FBI Name Check as backlogged.



    more...

    2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and
  • 2011 calendar february and


  • Kodi
    05-08 04:15 PM
    Do they always ask for recruitment info or only when they audit the case?




    2011 calendar february and march. March 2011 Monthly Calendar2011 calendar february and march. March 2011 Monthly Calendar
  • March 2011 Monthly Calendar


  • ahaadi
    03-04 05:03 PM
    Don't know what it means :) but my priority date is Aug 2006.

    Thanks.

    Any one else with recent RFEs/LUDs on their I-485 ? Pl post.



    more...

    2011 calendar february and march. 2011 CALENDAR FEBRUARY MARCH2011 calendar february and march. 2011 CALENDAR FEBRUARY MARCH
  • 2011 CALENDAR FEBRUARY MARCH


  • BPforGC
    03-05 02:36 PM
    No labor (NIW). PD April 2007. 485 in July 2007. All @ NSC

    My wife got RFE. Answered and received by USCIS on 26th Nov 2008. States "RFE received, case processing resumed". Soft on 2/25/2009.

    My 485: Case received on 24th July 2007... blah..blah...blah. Soft LUD 11/10/2008.

    EADs are approved and later renewed in 9-10 days (yes, 9-10 DAYS, USCIS is lightning fast in this aspect) at TSC, 2 yr EAD.

    NSC says my preadjudication complete, FBI cleared and waiting to be assigned to an officer. Same case as others "pending...VISA availability".

    Unless there is a legislation change, I have to wait till PD becomes current. However, the adjudication office can override the PD and allocate VISA number with a justification. This has happened to many people, so PD and VISA allocation is not an absolute must.

    Lets hope....:D




    2011 calendar february and march. 2011 CALENDAR FEBRUARY MARCH2011 calendar february and march. 2011 CALENDAR FEBRUARY MARCH
  • 2011 CALENDAR FEBRUARY MARCH


  • ilikekilo
    04-30 05:09 PM
    Some idiot gave me a red for asking for this translation...Whoever that is, please note that not all speak Hindi and I wanted to know what the poster was saying. So, go screw yourself if you don't like it.:mad::mad:

    how do u know if someone gives u red?



    more...

    2011 calendar february and march. march 2011 calendar2011 calendar february and march. march 2011 calendar
  • march 2011 calendar


  • smc
    07-20 01:06 PM
    Is there a way to seperate the HI-B increase from the EB- green card recapture? So long as they are lumped together, it will always be difficult to pass. Also, is it possible to make this apply to all EB categories, not just Schedule A and EB-1 and 2?

    Is there anything we can do for this?

    SMC




    2011 calendar february and march. FEBRUARY MARCH 2011 CALENDAR2011 calendar february and march. FEBRUARY MARCH 2011 CALENDAR
  • FEBRUARY MARCH 2011 CALENDAR


  • beppenyc
    03-16 10:51 AM
    http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0316Immigration16-ON.html

    Senators debate immigrant worker measure

    Associated Press
    Mar. 16, 2006 09:35 AM


    WASHINGTON - Senators writing a major immigration law overhaul bill moved Thursday toward accepting an approach under which undocumented immigrants could stay in the United States while working toward permanent residence and eventual citizenship.

    Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., stressed that his plan moving through the Senate Judiciary Committee would not constitute an amnesty, a policy rejected by the Bush administration and most Americans, according to polls. Kennedy said it would not give the estimated 11 million people in the country illegally any advantage over the 3 million living overseas while waiting for a decision on green card applications.

    Committee Chairman Arlen Specter said the panel would consider the proposal put forward by Kennedy and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., when it reconvenes on March 27 after a weeklong recess. advertisement




    Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., has made clear that immigration reform will be on the chamber's floor that week, regardless of whether the Judiciary Committee comes up with a comprehensive bill.

    Congress, at the urging of President Bush, has made comprehensive immigration reform a top priority for this election-year session, pushing forward proposals combining immigration enforcement, a guest worker program and a policy toward people living in the country illegally.

    The future treatment of undocumented immigrants, Kennedy said, "really is the heart and soul of this whole undertaking."

    The McCain-Kennedy plan would allow those in the country illegally to obtain six-year nonimmigrant visas under which they could work in the country and travel outside the country. They would have to pay a $1,000 fine and undergo background checks.

    After six years, the immigrant who pays back taxes, is learning English and pays an additional $1,000 fine can apply for a green card, or permanent residency.

    Specter, R-Pa., said the committee would vote on a version of the McCain-Kennedy proposal on the 27th. There would also be a vote on the chief alternative, offered by Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., that would give undocumented immigrants up to five years to leave the country. These immigrants could apply from their home country to return, either as temporary workers or for permanent residency.

    "Our intention is not to strand anyone outside the country," Kyl said. But he said that the McCain-Kennedy plan would give an undocumented immigrant allowed to stay and work in the country a "huge advantage" over a person having to wait for years in his or her own country for a green card.

    But with Democrats, and several Republicans, on the committee behind McCain-Kennedy, it appeared to have the edge.

    Cornyn and Kennedy said they would work over the recess next week on the structure of a guest worker program, which would start out with 400,000 visas. The committee is also expected to take up a separate provision for temporary agriculture workers in preparation for debate on the floor.

    Senators from both parties in the committee on Wednesday objected to voting on a bill before the panel reaches a consensus on guest workers. Several Republicans suggested that the Senate first deal with enforcement, and take up the guest worker issue later in the year.

    "This is a very complicated bill," Specter said. "And I think we have to get it done right."

    Bush, in a State of the Union address two years ago, urged Congress to create a worker program under which participants could gain legal status for a specific time and then be required to return home. It would not provide an automatic path to citizenship.

    The House at the end of last year passed a bill that increases penalties for illegal immigration activities and requires employers to verify the legal status of their employees. But it did not address the guest worker issue, and critics argued that it was futile to try to close the border when demand for low-wage workers in this country remains so strong.

    "We have a broken system," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Wednesday. "It needs to be fixed and it needs to be addressed in a comprehensive way."




    2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and2011 calendar february and march. 2011 calendar february and
  • 2011 calendar february and


  • pmb76
    09-13 04:54 PM
    I want everybody to get their GCs. but now interfiling/porting is hurting out position in the queue.

    If you are not aware, a good bunch of EB3s are now trying to interfile & port their PDs which are between 2001 - 2005 to EB2.

    This will potentially put tens of thousands of people in the EB2 queue before most people in EB2 who are waiting.

    These people were not eligible for EB2 when they filed their own labor.. so they should NOT BE ALLOWED TO PORT THEIR OLD PDs. Sure EB3 can Interfile .. but you will get a new PD ... the date you interfile.

    If we just keep looking... there will be a huge retrogression in EB2. And its not like these EB3 people will get through with the interfiling/porting. Most of them will be issued RFEs. Their labor apps will be audited and their primary EB3 apps will be cancelled. Infact, 85% of interfiling will never successfully make it through. And its not like it will help the EB3 brothers. That queue will still be long... because they are not going to withdraw their EB3 apps.
    Also, while they will not succeed in interfiling/porting, they still will have their apps with USCIS and USCIS will sit on them before eventually issuing NOID. Sad part is they will count these when giving numbers to DOS for setting visa bulletins.

    This PD porting is the last "not so ethical & legal" thing after labor substitution.. that we need to Put a cork on.

    If we don't act now... then we can all expect to stay in AOS for the next 5 years. This holds for both EB2 and EB3.

    I want everybody to get their GCs. I also am OK with the wait.
    But anything that threatens my position in the queue is not acceptable.

    I agree with you gctest. Interfiling EB3-->EB2 is the 2nd biggest scam perpetrated on the EB community after labor substitution. We must stop this dead in its tracks. It will lead to massive retrogressions in EB2 and keep the truly deserving candidates waiting for ever. USCIS just devises new laws on the fly without understanding its impact on the whole. I would call this rule very short-sighted and stupid. Nonetheless we need action at this point to do whatever we can to stop this mindlessness.
    I am with you on this campaign. Gave you green.




    chanduv23
    05-20 01:21 PM
    Thanks a lot for all the members who have shared their knowledge and insight into this issue.
    Also, my special thanks to chanduv23 with whom I have been in touch through out the process with congressional office.

    ind_game is now fully charged up to do something about these issues and has expressed his support to help fixing this issue.




    priderock
    06-01 03:31 PM
    I may be wrong but this is just an omission in the language of the bill. The effective date was stated as the date the bill is introduced, I guess it will change to some thin like when it is signed in to law or sixty days or 180 days from that date. As I said I could be wrong, but it seemed unfair and not right to make it effective retroactively.

    Note : this is for 140s only and not for AOS.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment