Amma
09-21 02:50 PM
Previously , I was working in Kuwait. My H1B got stamped in Kuwait.
I didn't face any problem in the visa interview.
However, I don't know much about UAE.
Best of luck.
I didn't face any problem in the visa interview.
However, I don't know much about UAE.
Best of luck.
wallpaper hot sleeve tattoos ideas skin
freddyCR
February 5th, 2005, 09:55 PM
Even the humble beans can be beautiful..
Exp. 1/240 s.
Apert. F3
Focal lenght 15 mm
ISO 200
Fujifilm S 7000
Colors enhanced - cropped in PS cs
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/beans2Medium.jpg
Exp. 1/240 s.
Apert. F3
Focal lenght 15 mm
ISO 200
Fujifilm S 7000
Colors enhanced - cropped in PS cs
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/beans2Medium.jpg
jayaj
08-07 09:04 AM
If I get an emergency visa(B2 to assist my unwell sister in US), and later I cancel my plan to visit US, will it have any adverse implications?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
2011 Geisha Tattoo And Japanese Tattoos: Forearm Sleeve Tattoos
Blog Feeds
03-22 12:20 PM
Dick Armey, former Republican House Majority Leader and one of the national leaders of the Tea Party activists, had some surprising comments on immigration. From the Arizona Daily Star: Republicans are alienating Hispanic voters with their rhetoric on the immigration issue, former House Majority Leader Dick Armey said Monday. 'These guys are trying to blow it,' Armey, a Texas Republican who now works closely with Tea Party activists, said at a National Press Club luncheon. Armey, one of the creators of the 'Contract with America' that launched the 1994 Republican revolution, says the party needs to be more careful when...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/tea-party-leader-criticizes-antiimmigration-republicans.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/tea-party-leader-criticizes-antiimmigration-republicans.html)
more...
gmail
07-21 05:35 AM
Hi,
In the process of renewing EAD, I realized that I got 2 EAD cards. One is through my own i-485. The second one was piggy-back from my spouse's i-485. To renew it, should I renew both?
The reason of two i-485 is a long story. Mine is EB-2, thus shorter retrogression. But back then, my job was shaky. At a matter of fact, I left the company before 180 days after i-485. I got I-140 later from the employer though.
So i applied another i-485 with my spouse's EB-3 i-485, thus another EAD.
I don't want to abandon my I-485 or my spouse's I-485. Should I apply to renew both EADs?
Best regards,
In the process of renewing EAD, I realized that I got 2 EAD cards. One is through my own i-485. The second one was piggy-back from my spouse's i-485. To renew it, should I renew both?
The reason of two i-485 is a long story. Mine is EB-2, thus shorter retrogression. But back then, my job was shaky. At a matter of fact, I left the company before 180 days after i-485. I got I-140 later from the employer though.
So i applied another i-485 with my spouse's EB-3 i-485, thus another EAD.
I don't want to abandon my I-485 or my spouse's I-485. Should I apply to renew both EADs?
Best regards,
beautifulMind
06-28 12:06 AM
Correction "Nowhere else the new job title is mentioned"
more...
raysaikat
05-26 02:13 AM
Hi,
I have recently been laid off from my job, I'm thinking of pursuing a associate degree course from a nearby community college and change to F1 status. I already have a MS degree, Would it be a problem for the change of status?
Thanks,
SK
F-1 is a non-immigrant visa that requires the applicant to prove that s/he has no intention for immigration.
I have recently been laid off from my job, I'm thinking of pursuing a associate degree course from a nearby community college and change to F1 status. I already have a MS degree, Would it be a problem for the change of status?
Thanks,
SK
F-1 is a non-immigrant visa that requires the applicant to prove that s/he has no intention for immigration.
2010 john mayer sleeve tattoo.
akhilmahajan
08-16 09:31 AM
Sir/Madam,
Right now they have not even done with July 2nd filers.
Also ppl whose applications have been transfered have not got any receipts.
About the 17th July, i think we should be atleast looking for minimum 15-20 business days.
I will request you to please concentrate on the September Rally. It will bring relief for all of us.
Right now they have not even done with July 2nd filers.
Also ppl whose applications have been transfered have not got any receipts.
About the 17th July, i think we should be atleast looking for minimum 15-20 business days.
I will request you to please concentrate on the September Rally. It will bring relief for all of us.
more...
chintu25
07-08 09:36 AM
Postthe names and numbers of Immigrant friendlies in senate so we may request them to appeal
hair 2011 shoulder sleeve tattoo.
a_paradkar
07-27 09:27 AM
I am currently working for Company A and would like to join company B on EAD. I have a valid EAD and would use it to switch over.
My question is
1. what document's are needed to send to USCIS for AC 21 for/from company B.
2. Do I need to send any documents?
Thanks for you
My question is
1. what document's are needed to send to USCIS for AC 21 for/from company B.
2. Do I need to send any documents?
Thanks for you
more...
Blog Feeds
09-16 05:40 AM
Very intriguing. Here's the lowdown from HuffPostHill: Luis Gutierrez, Nydia Velazquez and Bob Menendez will meet with the president tomorrow at 2:30 to talk immigration reform. Gutierrez says he'll push Obama to use his muscle to get the DREAM Act through Congress. If Rahm Emanuel shows up, two potential Chicago mayoral candidates will be in the room together. Gutierrez, who said today that a run is "tempting," said he'd have a hard time supporting Emanuel if he doesn't, given his history of slowing down immigration reform. He still remembers, Gutierrez said, when Emanuel, as head of the DCCC, was telling...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/gutierrez-support-for-rahms-mayoral-run-tied-to-dream-act.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/gutierrez-support-for-rahms-mayoral-run-tied-to-dream-act.html)
hot full sleeve tattoos.
IN2US
07-25 06:05 PM
Hi
I have moved recently to San Jose. Can anyone help me where to find doctor for my medical check up for my GC.
check this link
https://egov.uscis.gov/crisgwi/go?action=offices.type&OfficeLocator.office_type=CIV
Hope this helps
Good Luck :)
I have moved recently to San Jose. Can anyone help me where to find doctor for my medical check up for my GC.
check this link
https://egov.uscis.gov/crisgwi/go?action=offices.type&OfficeLocator.office_type=CIV
Hope this helps
Good Luck :)
more...
house Colorful Leg Sleeve Tattoos
shouldIwait
05-14 10:41 PM
Pictures are listed in required list of documents but they don't ask for them always. My wife went for stamping 4 months back and they just looked at marriage-certificate and my approved petition....that's it ! But I have seen CO's asking for pics.
So it's a hit/miss kinda deal....
So it's a hit/miss kinda deal....
tattoo tree sleeve tattoos that a
Dilemma
09-13 01:45 AM
Discuss with attorney
more...
pictures Dark hair girls with half
STAmisha
11-02 08:47 AM
Please let me know if 140 processing times is based on receipt date or notice date?
I'm a concurrent 140-485 filer, filed on July 2 2007. My notice date on I-140 says August 16, 2007, where as my friend who filed only140 on july 2 has Notice date of july 12. Does that mean his will be processed first?
I'm a concurrent 140-485 filer, filed on July 2 2007. My notice date on I-140 says August 16, 2007, where as my friend who filed only140 on july 2 has Notice date of july 12. Does that mean his will be processed first?
dresses hairstyles sleeve tattoos
wandmaker
12-13 08:40 AM
when filling the education details in DS 157 - I gave the STD code wrong,for one of my educational institutions
You can go online and change; In case, you are unable to do it - take a print out of filled application and correct it by hand, dont worry about this.
You can go online and change; In case, you are unable to do it - take a print out of filled application and correct it by hand, dont worry about this.
more...
makeup A sleeve tattoo refers to that
alien02k
07-11 09:59 AM
First of all I am filing by postal mail USPS(not e-filing)
1)is it necessary to include I-765 receipt notice(EAD) with my AP application.. But I have only my last years one which will expire in a few months.
2) for AP renewal is it necessary to include marriage certificate for spouse
3) When filing by postal mail, and also considering i applied my I-485/I-140 before july 30/2007, old fee schedule... do i need to pay biometric fee for my AP renewal
4) I am in Texas and for mailing EAD and AP - can I send them together for me and my spouse. I see different PO Boxes for EAD and AP addresses for the Mesquite, TX address
IN I-765, is it enough only to specify the previous EAD information regarding the office filed and receipt date...or do i have to include my OPT EAD as well as my previous EAD filed last year.
Any clarification is highly appreciated
Thank you
1)is it necessary to include I-765 receipt notice(EAD) with my AP application.. But I have only my last years one which will expire in a few months.
2) for AP renewal is it necessary to include marriage certificate for spouse
3) When filing by postal mail, and also considering i applied my I-485/I-140 before july 30/2007, old fee schedule... do i need to pay biometric fee for my AP renewal
4) I am in Texas and for mailing EAD and AP - can I send them together for me and my spouse. I see different PO Boxes for EAD and AP addresses for the Mesquite, TX address
IN I-765, is it enough only to specify the previous EAD information regarding the office filed and receipt date...or do i have to include my OPT EAD as well as my previous EAD filed last year.
Any clarification is highly appreciated
Thank you
girlfriend Sleeve Tattoos For Girls
eastindia
05-07 02:59 PM
Do you know why extension was denied?
hairstyles Tattoos use to be a mark of
Macaca
03-18 07:25 AM
Some paras from Congress's Oversight Offensive (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/16/AR2007031601989.html), By David S. Broder (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/david+s.+broder/), Sunday, March 18, 2007
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
Ten weeks into the new Congress, it is clear that revelation, not legislation, is going to be its real product.
While President Bush threatens to use his veto pen to stop some bills and Senate Republicans block other measures from even reaching his desk, no force in Washington can halt the Democrats' investigative juggernaut from uncovering the secrets inside this administration.
For the first six years of the Bush administration, these aides were allowed free rein to carry out whatever policy or political assignments they wished -- or supposed that the president wanted done. A Congress under firm Republican control was somnolent when it came to oversight of the executive branch. No Republican committee chairman wanted to turn over rocks in a Republican administration.
You have to feel a twinge of sympathy now for the Bush appointees who suddenly find unsympathetic Democratic chairmen such as Henry Waxman, John Conyers, Patrick Leahy and Carl Levin investigating their cases. Even if those appointees are scrupulously careful about their actions now, who knows what subpoenaed memos and e-mails in their files will reveal about the past?
They will pay the price for the temporary breakdown in the system of checks and balances that occurred between 2001 and this year -- when the Republican Congress forgot its responsibility to hold the executive branch accountable.
It was a fundamental dereliction of duty by Congress, and it probably did more to encourage bad decisions and harmful actions by executive-branch political appointees than the much-touted lobbying influence. In reality, many Republican members of Congress did not mind what was happening because they were able to get favors done in that permissive climate. Now, the Democratic investigators will publicize instances of influence by members of Congress, and the political fallout will not stop with New Mexico's Pete Domenici and Heather Wilson.
Democrats find it easier to investigate than to legislate. With their major initiatives, from a minimum-wage boost to a shutdown of the Iraq war, stymied by Republican opposition, the Democrats are understandably making "accountability" their new goal -- meaning more and more investigations.
Fulfilling that promise, later in the week the House passed a series of bills that stripped some of the secrecy from executive branch documents and decisions.
Accountability is certainly important, but Democrats must know that people were really voting for action on Iraq, health care, immigration, energy and a few other problems. Investigations are useful, but only legislation on big issues changes lives.
kumsoft
07-17 05:43 PM
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22912
Jithesh
05-25 12:14 AM
Hi,
I am here in US working for a company on L1 Visa. My Visa and I-94 expires on November 2010. The company has already applied for my H1. I am planning for a vacation to India in August. I have the following question,
1. When I comes back to US from my vacation, in September, I dont have to go to the consulate, as my L1 is still valid. And I wont be able to go to the consulate for H1 stamping, as they wouldnt have started the stamping for this year, right?
2. Once I am back in L1, do I have to go back to India for H1 stamping, as my L1 expires in November?
3. Or the best method is to visit India after October and get it stamped with H1 from the consulate while coming back from India?
Jithesh
I am here in US working for a company on L1 Visa. My Visa and I-94 expires on November 2010. The company has already applied for my H1. I am planning for a vacation to India in August. I have the following question,
1. When I comes back to US from my vacation, in September, I dont have to go to the consulate, as my L1 is still valid. And I wont be able to go to the consulate for H1 stamping, as they wouldnt have started the stamping for this year, right?
2. Once I am back in L1, do I have to go back to India for H1 stamping, as my L1 expires in November?
3. Or the best method is to visit India after October and get it stamped with H1 from the consulate while coming back from India?
Jithesh
No comments:
Post a Comment