Jimi_Hendrix
11-21 10:49 AM
Time: 3pm
Conference Dial-In: (712) 432-3000
Conference Bridge: 227974
Topic for Discussion:
� Organizing teams for meeting recently elected politicians
� Create a presentation/script before meeting congressional representative�s office
� Call the congressional person to organize a meeting
� Possible opportunities to create a booth for signing up IV members
Conference Dial-In: (712) 432-3000
Conference Bridge: 227974
Topic for Discussion:
� Organizing teams for meeting recently elected politicians
� Create a presentation/script before meeting congressional representative�s office
� Call the congressional person to organize a meeting
� Possible opportunities to create a booth for signing up IV members
kevinkris
05-23 02:10 PM
Subscription Payment Sent (Unique Transaction ID #9AK05597S18798425)
In reference to:S-472207269L710703U
Original Transaction
Date Type Status Details Amount
May 23, 2008 Payment To Immigration Voice Completed ... -$50.00 USD
Everyone subscribe... I was skeptic before just like you. But it's NOW or NEVER..
YES WE CAN.. Go IV..
In reference to:S-472207269L710703U
Original Transaction
Date Type Status Details Amount
May 23, 2008 Payment To Immigration Voice Completed ... -$50.00 USD
Everyone subscribe... I was skeptic before just like you. But it's NOW or NEVER..
YES WE CAN.. Go IV..
manderson
03-04 10:09 AM
There is an I-131 LUD today from NSC and it says document mailed and that it will be delivered within 30 days.
My RD is 8/15, ND is 10/12. I guess the Processing Times (@ 9/30 as of Feb 15, 08) caught up.
Hang in there guys.
My RD is 8/15, ND is 10/12. I guess the Processing Times (@ 9/30 as of Feb 15, 08) caught up.
Hang in there guys.
sunny1000
07-06 06:24 PM
And how does it not apply to AOS.
For Consular processing people have to plan trips and get medical and all that.
Why doesnt the same analogy apply to AOS. - Please explain...:confused:
The difference is that AOS is handled by USCIS and the CP is done by DOS. It is the USCIS which ran out of the 60000 visas (supposedly) before July 1st even though DOS opened those numbers up for the entire July.
Now, DOS is saying to USCIS " you guys used your quota even before the rush started and so, we won't give you any more visa numbers but, we will continue to honor our quota via CP which we accounted for July". Just my interpretation. Don't shoot the messenger ;)
For Consular processing people have to plan trips and get medical and all that.
Why doesnt the same analogy apply to AOS. - Please explain...:confused:
The difference is that AOS is handled by USCIS and the CP is done by DOS. It is the USCIS which ran out of the 60000 visas (supposedly) before July 1st even though DOS opened those numbers up for the entire July.
Now, DOS is saying to USCIS " you guys used your quota even before the rush started and so, we won't give you any more visa numbers but, we will continue to honor our quota via CP which we accounted for July". Just my interpretation. Don't shoot the messenger ;)
more...
JunRN
09-29 01:29 AM
If USCIS waste another 11,000 visas this year...it is equivalent to one year visas for one country (9,800 EB visas per country per year)....can you imagine that?
The problem is compounded because applicants who supposedly got the visa this year would get the visa allocation from FY2008. That visa number could have been yours....or mine....
The problem is compounded because applicants who supposedly got the visa this year would get the visa allocation from FY2008. That visa number could have been yours....or mine....
lelica32
09-26 05:17 PM
I'v send a letter today. Let see if the Ombudsman will send me a answer.
more...
soorigadu2003
07-11 09:46 AM
GREAT NEWS...
but why is USCIS website not showing Aug bulletin ?
but why is USCIS website not showing Aug bulletin ?
sanju
04-30 04:25 PM
For all those who are upset with the House hearing, please take it easy. Please do not expect the hearing to discuss the details of each and every GC applicant's case. The objective of the hearing was to bring the folks involved in visa bulletins and GC processing, and make them all publically say and agree that Lofgren-Sensenbrenner bill will not flood the country with new people on the borders but at the same time since the federal agencies did not do their job properly, so it would make sense to recapture the visa numbers, and that's it.
I think that this objective was achieved pretty handsomely without much opposition. So everybody was on the same page, other than Ranking member King, whose job in such meetings is to oppose whatever the committee chair is proposing. Rep. King did not have much to say as Rep. Sensenbrenner has co-sponsored the bill. Noticeably, Rep. Gutierrez supported the bill, which means Hispanic Caucus may not oppose it either, hopefully. So it was all good.
I think that this objective was achieved pretty handsomely without much opposition. So everybody was on the same page, other than Ranking member King, whose job in such meetings is to oppose whatever the committee chair is proposing. Rep. King did not have much to say as Rep. Sensenbrenner has co-sponsored the bill. Noticeably, Rep. Gutierrez supported the bill, which means Hispanic Caucus may not oppose it either, hopefully. So it was all good.
more...
lccleared
09-10 09:24 PM
Small Contribution of $ 100 through Paypal. Confirmation # 2SX022305K271564K.
bharol
07-11 01:14 PM
This bulletin does prove that very few labor certificaions were done in 2005, due to move to PERM.
And those who had applied in PERM in 2005, got their GCs already..
I know a few who applied in PERM as soon it was introduced and got their
GCs last year.
And those who had applied in PERM in 2005, got their GCs already..
I know a few who applied in PERM as soon it was introduced and got their
GCs last year.
more...
truthinspector
09-14 10:12 PM
Well said ! It seems some people are under the assumption here that every EB2 has a higher IQ and skill than every EB3. I dont know where that logic comes from. Not to offend any highly educated EB2/EB1, but I have personally known so many highly qualified engineers who are extremely incompentent. A person's skill has no direct correlation with the EB category under which (s)he is filed. In my current job, I also know a EB1 engineer whose skills were questionable and was recently kicked out.
There is no reason to divide the community further. The notion of fairness is already destroyed due to pre-approved labor. I know someone who used it, and has a GC now. But guess what, he gets kicked out of any job every 6 months since he has no skills. Now , its easy for him to find a new job, since he has the GC. But 6 more months (or sometimes lesser) and he is jobless.
A lot of people had applied in EB3 since EB3 was current for a fairly long time and their lawyers suggested them
to do so to avoid additional documentation. Many of these people could have applied in EB2 as they had the required qualification including me (US masters). Just like you could have applied in EB1 since you have a Ph.D; but you decided to apply in EB2.
The catagory on which a person applies for greencard doesn't necessarily reflect his/her capability or intelligence. After all, if Michael Dell or Bill Gates had to apply for green card they had to apply in EB3. On the other hand, a lot of EB2 filers just fabricated their resumes with years of experience to qualify for EB2. But that shouldn't overcast shadows on real EB2 peoples ability.
I don't know from where you got your Ph.D but it definitely didn't inprove your ability to think rationally as evident in your post.
There is no reason to divide the community further. The notion of fairness is already destroyed due to pre-approved labor. I know someone who used it, and has a GC now. But guess what, he gets kicked out of any job every 6 months since he has no skills. Now , its easy for him to find a new job, since he has the GC. But 6 more months (or sometimes lesser) and he is jobless.
A lot of people had applied in EB3 since EB3 was current for a fairly long time and their lawyers suggested them
to do so to avoid additional documentation. Many of these people could have applied in EB2 as they had the required qualification including me (US masters). Just like you could have applied in EB1 since you have a Ph.D; but you decided to apply in EB2.
The catagory on which a person applies for greencard doesn't necessarily reflect his/her capability or intelligence. After all, if Michael Dell or Bill Gates had to apply for green card they had to apply in EB3. On the other hand, a lot of EB2 filers just fabricated their resumes with years of experience to qualify for EB2. But that shouldn't overcast shadows on real EB2 peoples ability.
I don't know from where you got your Ph.D but it definitely didn't inprove your ability to think rationally as evident in your post.
diptam
07-06 12:48 PM
For last few year...
"Backlog - retrogression - Can't process more than 1 case in 1 week, have patience guys...."
And Today ...
"Yes we can process 25000 cases in 48 hrs , that's called efficiency "
An we keep on accepting whatever is slapped on us and who knows what will be said to us in future.... "guys go home" ???
I wonder what.....something is coooking and they will be some changes soon. I have a feeling they are in fear of the lawsuit and media coverage as this thing has in fact taken off....
"Backlog - retrogression - Can't process more than 1 case in 1 week, have patience guys...."
And Today ...
"Yes we can process 25000 cases in 48 hrs , that's called efficiency "
An we keep on accepting whatever is slapped on us and who knows what will be said to us in future.... "guys go home" ???
I wonder what.....something is coooking and they will be some changes soon. I have a feeling they are in fear of the lawsuit and media coverage as this thing has in fact taken off....
more...
Legal
07-20 11:10 AM
Dems are unlilkely to support stand alone EB/ SKIL type legislations. They MAY agree for such legislation
(1) if they could get some cover with additional legislation like Durbin-Grasley restrictive bill on H1B - taking care of "middle class" "suffering" from "H1B cheap foreign labor" vote bank
(2) and get some pro-illegal legislation like DREAM act attached; taking care of Hispanic vote bank.
(1) if they could get some cover with additional legislation like Durbin-Grasley restrictive bill on H1B - taking care of "middle class" "suffering" from "H1B cheap foreign labor" vote bank
(2) and get some pro-illegal legislation like DREAM act attached; taking care of Hispanic vote bank.
prakashv44
01-07 12:17 PM
Just send your I-140 approved docs to the bank. I got the approval with my I-140 itself
more...
santb1975
05-29 11:33 PM
Have not reached 20K yet
NolaIndian32
07-11 10:37 AM
I second yabadaba's sentiment! :):):):):):):):):):):):)
wooohooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooo
wooohooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooo
more...
chi_shark
02-23 05:45 PM
In the guideline for interpreting the dates USCIS hasn't mentioned anything about PD being current. So I think they process applications regardless of PD being current or not
'The table shown below is intended to be a tool for customers to view our processing times. When applications and petitions are completed within our target timeframes, those timeframes will be shown (example: 3 months). If we are not meeting our target timeframes a date will be shown (example: April 16, 2008).'
thats true, but when does the target timeframe clock start? when they receive the app or when the priority date becomes current?
'The table shown below is intended to be a tool for customers to view our processing times. When applications and petitions are completed within our target timeframes, those timeframes will be shown (example: 3 months). If we are not meeting our target timeframes a date will be shown (example: April 16, 2008).'
thats true, but when does the target timeframe clock start? when they receive the app or when the priority date becomes current?
Macaca
09-15 10:18 AM
Caught in a bureaucratic black hole Applicants seeking U.S. citizenship languish for years as the FBI conducts cumbersome records checks (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=162416&postcount=1062) Lawsuits are a result By Anna Gorman (anna.gorman@latimes.com) | Los Angeles Times Staff Writer, September 10, 2007
A Solution Seen to �Brain Drain� (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=154885&postcount=995) By STEVE LOHR (slohr@nytimes.com) | New York Times, August 27, 2007
"Reverse brain drain" threatens U.S. competitiveness, study says (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=151661&postcount=960) By RACHEL KONRAD (rkonrad@ap.org) | AP Business Writer, 08/21/2007
Land of the Less-Free (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/web/la-oew-welch21aug21,1,291082.story) New passport and child-support laws are making the country less free for law abiding citizens By Matt Welch (matt.welch@latimes.com) | LA Times, August 21, 2007
Immigration Activists March in L.A. (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IMMIGRATION_ACTIVIST?SITE=PASTR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT) By CHRISTOPHER WEBER (cweber@ap.org) | Associated Press Writer, Aug 25 2007
Lofgren battles steep rise in fees immigrants pay (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=137273&postcount=869) By Tyche Hendricks (thendricks@sfchronicle.com), Chronicle Staff Writer, August 1, 2007
Immigrant rights protesters rally at Capitol (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=75396&postcount=38) By Molly Hennessy-Fiske (molly.hennessy-fiske@latimes.com), Times Staff Writer, June 2, 2007
Tech industry to keep pressing visa needs IMMIGRATION REFORM'S COLLAPSE GETS FIRMS LOOKING ABROAD (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=104996&postcount=664) By Frank Davies (fdavies@mercurynews.com or (202) 662-8921), MediaNews Washington Bureau, 07/09/2007
Microsoft moves north Unable to meet its hiring needs because of U.S. immigration policy, the software company is opening an office in Vancouver (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=105200&postcount=666) LA Times Editorial (letters@latimes.com), July 10, 2007
A Solution Seen to �Brain Drain� (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=154885&postcount=995) By STEVE LOHR (slohr@nytimes.com) | New York Times, August 27, 2007
"Reverse brain drain" threatens U.S. competitiveness, study says (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=151661&postcount=960) By RACHEL KONRAD (rkonrad@ap.org) | AP Business Writer, 08/21/2007
Land of the Less-Free (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/web/la-oew-welch21aug21,1,291082.story) New passport and child-support laws are making the country less free for law abiding citizens By Matt Welch (matt.welch@latimes.com) | LA Times, August 21, 2007
Immigration Activists March in L.A. (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IMMIGRATION_ACTIVIST?SITE=PASTR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT) By CHRISTOPHER WEBER (cweber@ap.org) | Associated Press Writer, Aug 25 2007
Lofgren battles steep rise in fees immigrants pay (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=137273&postcount=869) By Tyche Hendricks (thendricks@sfchronicle.com), Chronicle Staff Writer, August 1, 2007
Immigrant rights protesters rally at Capitol (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=75396&postcount=38) By Molly Hennessy-Fiske (molly.hennessy-fiske@latimes.com), Times Staff Writer, June 2, 2007
Tech industry to keep pressing visa needs IMMIGRATION REFORM'S COLLAPSE GETS FIRMS LOOKING ABROAD (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=104996&postcount=664) By Frank Davies (fdavies@mercurynews.com or (202) 662-8921), MediaNews Washington Bureau, 07/09/2007
Microsoft moves north Unable to meet its hiring needs because of U.S. immigration policy, the software company is opening an office in Vancouver (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=105200&postcount=666) LA Times Editorial (letters@latimes.com), July 10, 2007
fuzzy logic
07-18 03:32 PM
Hi everyone!
I just realized that USCIS has made a mistake in I-140 approval notice. My labor and I-140 application was for EB-3. However, my lawyer made a mistake in checking EB-2 box instead of EB-3 box in the I-140 application. All other description and details were for EB-3.
USCIS also sent an RFE to know whether the application is for EB-2 or EB-3. My lawyer promptly responded that it was an honest mistake and the application was for EB-3.
Just today I realized that despite our response to RFE, USCIS gave and approval notice of I-140 for EB-2 and not EB-3.
I don't know, if my lawyer has noticed this mistake yet. I want to apply for AOS now and don't want to draw my employer / lawyer attention to it as I don't know what their reaction will be.
Can any one please advice me if this will have any adverse implication down the line? I am concerned as the approval is inconsistent with the labor approval that was with the intention of filing under EB-3. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
I just realized that USCIS has made a mistake in I-140 approval notice. My labor and I-140 application was for EB-3. However, my lawyer made a mistake in checking EB-2 box instead of EB-3 box in the I-140 application. All other description and details were for EB-3.
USCIS also sent an RFE to know whether the application is for EB-2 or EB-3. My lawyer promptly responded that it was an honest mistake and the application was for EB-3.
Just today I realized that despite our response to RFE, USCIS gave and approval notice of I-140 for EB-2 and not EB-3.
I don't know, if my lawyer has noticed this mistake yet. I want to apply for AOS now and don't want to draw my employer / lawyer attention to it as I don't know what their reaction will be.
Can any one please advice me if this will have any adverse implication down the line? I am concerned as the approval is inconsistent with the labor approval that was with the intention of filing under EB-3. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
chiragmodi
09-10 10:28 AM
So far contributed $200. Can not make it to the rally because of prior commitments.
EB3
pd: dec 2005.
lc approved: Jan 2006
I-485 filed on july 2 and fp done on 09/07.
Thanks guys for all your efforts. This is massive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EB3
pd: dec 2005.
lc approved: Jan 2006
I-485 filed on july 2 and fp done on 09/07.
Thanks guys for all your efforts. This is massive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tikka
07-19 02:17 PM
Contributed $100 today, earlier contribution $50.
Order Details - Jul 19, 2007 2:28 PM EDT
Google Order #464374160968946
so much for your contribution... :)
Order Details - Jul 19, 2007 2:28 PM EDT
Google Order #464374160968946
so much for your contribution... :)
No comments:
Post a Comment